1-Step vs 2-Step Prop Firm Challenges — Which Should You Choose?
One of the first decisions you'll face when choosing a prop firm is the challenge format: 1-Step or 2-Step? Each has clear advantages and trade-offs that can significantly impact your chances of getting funded.
How 1-Step Challenges Work
A 1-Step evaluation has a single phase. You need to hit a profit target (usually 8-10%) while staying within the maximum drawdown limit. Once you pass, you get a funded account.
Advantages of 1-Step:
Disadvantages of 1-Step:
How 2-Step Challenges Work
A 2-Step evaluation has two phases:
Only after passing both phases do you receive funding.
Advantages of 2-Step:
Disadvantages of 2-Step:
Which Firms Offer What?
Best 1-Step Challenge Firms:
Best 2-Step Challenge Firms:
Firms That Offer Both:
1-Step vs 2-Step: Side by Side
| Feature | 1-Step | 2-Step |
|---|---|---|
| Phases | 1 | 2 |
| Typical profit target | 8-10% | Phase 1: 8-10%, Phase 2: 5% |
| Time to funded | Faster | Slower |
| Difficulty | Higher per phase | Lower per phase |
| Cost | Sometimes higher | Sometimes lower |
| Best for | Experienced traders | Beginners |
Which Format Is Better for Beginners?
If you're new to prop trading, we recommend starting with a 2-Step challenge. Here's why:
Our pick for beginners: FundedNext — no time limits mean you can take as long as you need, and the 95% profit split rewards your patience.
Which Format Is Better for Experienced Traders?
If you're a profitable trader who just needs capital, 1-Step is the way to go:
Our pick for experienced traders: Apex Trader Funding — $17 entry with 100% profit split on first $25K is simply unbeatable.
The Bottom Line
There's no universally "better" format — it depends on your experience level, trading style, and risk tolerance.
Use our Prop Firm Matcher to find the perfect challenge format for your trading style.